Tax Lawyer's Blog

Pappas on Taxation

Tax  Lawyer's  Blog header image 2

The Share of Taxes Paid by the Rich Increased During the Bush Tax Cut Years

December 14th, 2010 · 5 Comments

This is beautiful because it exposes the left’s lie that the rich have not paid their fair share of taxes during the Bush tax cut years. In fact, it is so good that I predict it will be immediately and roundly denounced by the left as right-wing propaganda.

Nick Gillespie of Reason reports that from 2000 through 2008 the share of taxes paid by the rich increased while the share of taxes paid by the middle class and poor decreased:

For all the yammering about the wisdom or tragedy of extending Bush-era tax rates, precious little hot air has been expended on, like, looking at what effects the goddamn things had on who paid how much tax. Back during the 2008 election, Joe Biden used to say that it was “patriotic” to ask the rich to pay “their fair share” in taxes. What that widely repeated nostrum misses is that the rich (however defined) have been paying a greater share of income taxes in the aughts.

Below is a chart from the Tax Foundation that lists the percent of federal income tax paid by each income group. Whatever else you want to say about the Bush tax rates, they made the wealthy pony up more of the whole.

Percent of Federal Income Tax Paid by Each Group

 Year                          Top .01       Top 1%          Top 5%          5-10%            Top 10%        10-25%           Top 25%      25-50%           Top 50%        Bot 50%

2000     37.42% 56.47% 10.86% 67.33% 16.68% 84.01% 12.08% 96.09% 3.91%
2001   16.06% 33.89% 53.25% 11.64% 64.89% 18.01% 82.90% 13.13% 96.03% 3.97%
2002   15.43% 33.71% 53.80% 11.94% 65.73% 18.16% 83.90% 12.60% 96.50% 3.50%
2003   15.68% 34.27% 54.36% 11.48% 65.84% 18.04% 83.88% 12.65% 96.54% 3.46%
2004   17.44% 36.89% 57.13% 11.07% 68.19% 16.67% 84.86% 11.85% 96.70% 3.30%
2005   19.26% 39.38% 59.67% 10.63% 70.30% 15.69% 85.99% 10.94% 96.93% 3.07%
2006   19.56% 39.89% 60.14% 10.65% 70.79% 15.47% 86.27% 10.75% 97.01% 2.99%
2007   20.19% 40.41% 60.61% 10.59% 71.20% 15.37% 86.57% 10.54% 97.11% 2.89%
2008   18.47% 38.02% 58.72% 11.22% 69.94% 16.40% 86.34% 10.96% 97.30% 2.70%

How has it come to be that we have a tax structure that forces 10% of the people to pay 60% of the nation’s taxes yet we still have people who accuse the 10% of being money-grabbers and con artists simply because they oppose policies that would force them to pay an even greater percentage of the nation’s taxes?

Could it be that no amount of tax contribution by the rich will ever satisfy the class warfarists among us?

Tags: Politics of Taxes · Tax Policy

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Nosey // Dec 15, 2010 at 2:08 am

    How does this change compare to, say, the Clinton years? It’s hard to judge policy with nothing to compare it to.

  • 2 Peter // Dec 15, 2010 at 9:27 am

    Nosey,

    Read Gillespie’s article. He compares it to the Clinton years.

    But it really doesn’t matter for my purposes. The important thing is that the rich pay MORE than their fair share and it’s increasing.

  • 3 How to Raise a Class Warfarist in One Simple Parable // Dec 15, 2010 at 10:27 am

    [...] RSS ← The Share of Taxes Paid by the Rich Increased During the Bush Tax Cut Years [...]

  • 4 Jo // Mar 29, 2011 at 7:37 am

    The rich are paying more because they earned more.

    Many jobs were shipped overseas and many workers are earning less.

  • 5 Peter // Mar 29, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    It’s legal to move jobs overseas.

Leave a Comment