Fellow tax blogger Mary O’Keeffe of Bed Buffaloes in Your Tax Code left this question in a comment to my post titled Do You Need a Lawyer?:
Peter, there’s been a lot of press coverage of this case, but none that I’ve seen discusses the fact that the Tax Court opinion for Ms. Singleton-Clark’s case prominently states:
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT
BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY
OTHER CASE.Given that the press has not discussed this point, I’d be interested in your comments on the extent to which other taxpayers can or should rely–even informally–on an opinion issued under a Section 7463 filing.
Code § 7463 provides the procedural rule for small tax cases (emphasis added in bold italics):
§ 7463. Disputes involving $50,000 or less
(1) $50,000 for any one taxable year, in the case of the taxes imposed by subtitle A,
(2) $50,000, in the case of the tax imposed by chapter 11,
(3) $50,000 for any one calendar year, in the case of the tax imposed by chapter 12, or
(4) $50,000 for any 1 taxable period (or, if there is no taxable period, taxable event) in the case of any tax imposed by subtitle D which is described in section 6212 (a) (relating to a notice of deficiency),
at the option of the taxpayer concurred in by the Tax Court or a division thereof before the hearing of the case, proceedings in the case shall be conducted under this section. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 7453, such proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with such rules of evidence, practice, and procedure as the Tax Court may prescribe. A decision, together with a brief summary of the reasons therefor, in any such case shall satisfy the requirements of sections 7459 (b) and 7460.
(b) Finality of decisions – A decision entered in any case in which the proceedings are conducted under this section shall not be reviewed in any other court and shall not be treated as a precedent for any other case.
Even though § 7463 decisions are not reviewable and not to be treated as precedent by other Courts, they can and should be used as authority in tax audits and IRS appeals. In other words, the Tax Court’s holding in a 7463 case, although not binding on other Courts, should still be highly persuasive in an IRS administrative dispute. This is especially true if the holding (and the reasoning supporting it) is consistent with other, non-7463 Tax Court rulings.
Taxpayers often represent themselves in § 7463 small tax cases because they are less formal and result in a quicker resolution of the issues involved.
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment